From the starting of the COVID-19 pandemic, the clarion name has been to check, take a look at and take a look at some extra. Nonetheless, proper from the beginning, severe questions arose about the checks getting used to diagnose this an infection, and questions have solely multiplied since then.
Constructive reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) checks have been used because the justification for retaining giant parts of the world locked down for the higher a part of 2020.
This, regardless of the truth that PCR checks have confirmed remarkably unreliable with excessive false outcome charges, and are not designed for use as a diagnostic software within the first place as they can’t distinguish between inactive viruses and “reside” or reproductive ones.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice chairman and scientific director of Pfizer, has even gone on report stating1 that false optimistic outcomes from unreliable PCR checks are getting used to “manufacture a ‘second wave’ primarily based on ‘new instances,'” when in reality a second wave is very unlikely.
Understanding PCR Checks
Earlier than his demise, the inventor of the PCR take a look at, Kary Mullis, repeatedly but unsuccessfully careworn that this take a look at shouldn’t be used as a diagnostic software for the easy cause that it is incapable of diagnosing illness. A optimistic take a look at doesn’t truly imply that an energetic an infection is current. As famous in a U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and prevention publication on coronavirus and PCR testing dated July 13 2020:2
- Detection of viral RNA could not point out the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for scientific signs.
- The efficiency of this take a look at has not been established for monitoring therapy of 2019-nCoV an infection.
- This take a look at can’t rule out ailments brought on by different bacterial or viral pathogens.
So, what does the PCR test actually tell us? The PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. Nonetheless, the genetic snippets are so small they have to be amplified as a way to turn into discernible. Every spherical of amplification is known as a cycle.
Amplification over 35 cycles is taken into account unreliable and scientifically unjustified, but Drosten checks and checks advisable by the World Well being Group are set to 45 cycles.
What this does is amplify any, even insignificant sequences of viral DNA that is perhaps current to the purpose that the take a look at reads “optimistic,” even when the viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive. Because of these extreme cycle thresholds, you find yourself with a far larger variety of optimistic checks than you would in any other case.
We have additionally had issues with defective and contaminated checks. As quickly because the genetic sequence for SARS-CoV-2 turned obtainable in January 2020, German researchers shortly developed a PCR take a look at for the virus.
In March 2020, The New York Occasions3 reported the preliminary take a look at kits developed by the CDC had been discovered to be flawed. The Verge additionally reported4 that this flawed CDC take a look at in flip turned the idea for the WHO’s take a look at, which the CDC ended up refusing to make use of.
PCR Checks Can’t Detect An infection
Maybe most importantly of all, the PCR checks can’t distinguish between inactive viruses and “reside” or reproductive ones. What which means is that PCR checks can’t detect an infection. Interval. It can’t inform you whether or not you are at the moment sick, whether or not you may develop signs within the close to future, or whether or not you are contagious.
The checks could decide up useless particles or inactive viral particles that pose no danger in anyway to the affected person and others. What’s extra, the take a look at can decide up the presence of different coronaviruses, so a optimistic outcome could merely point out that you’ve got recuperated from a standard chilly up to now.
An “an infection” is when a virus penetrates right into a cell and replicates. Because the virus multiplies, signs set in. An individual is barely infectious if the virus is definitely replicating. So long as the virus is inactive and never replicating, it is utterly innocent each to the host and others.
Likelihood is, in case you have no signs, a optimistic take a look at merely means it has detected inactive viral DNA in your physique. This could additionally imply that you’re not contagious and pose no danger to anybody.
For all of these causes, a lot of extremely revered scientists all over the world are actually saying that what we now have just isn’t a COVID-19 pandemic however a PCR take a look at pandemic. In his September 20, 2020, article5 “Lies, Damned Lies and Well being Statistics — The Lethal Hazard of False Positives,” Yeadon explains why basing our pandemic response on optimistic PCR checks is so problematic.
In brief, it seems tens of millions of individuals are merely being discovered to hold inactive viral DNA that pose no danger to anybody, but these take a look at outcomes are being utilized by the global technocracy to implement a model new economic and social system based on draconian surveillance and totalitarian controls.
Artificially Created Justifications for Totalitarian Controls
As reported by The Vaccine Response, September 29, 2020:6
“The take a look at’s threshold is so excessive that it detects individuals with the reside virus in addition to these with a number of genetic fragments left over from a previous an infection that not poses a danger. It is like discovering a hair in a room after an individual left it, says Michael Mina, MD, an epidemiologist on the Harvard T.H. Chan College of Public Well being.7
In three units of testing knowledge that embrace cycle thresholds compiled by officers in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, as much as 90% of individuals testing optimistic carried barely any virus, a overview by The New York Occasions discovered8 …
‘We have been utilizing one kind of knowledge for all the things, and that’s simply plus or minus — that is all,’ Dr. Mina stated. ‘We’re utilizing that for scientific diagnostics, for public well being, for coverage decision-making.’
However ‘sure’ or ‘no’ is not adequate, he added. It is the quantity of virus that ought to dictate the contaminated affected person’s subsequent steps. ‘It is actually irresponsible, I believe, to forgo the popularity that it is a quantitative challenge,’ Dr. Mina stated.”
Once more, medical consultants agree any cycle threshold over 35 cycles makes the take a look at too delicate, as at that time it begins choosing up innocent inactive DNA fragments. Mina believes a extra cheap cutoff can be 30 or much less.
Based on The New York Occasions,9 the CDC’s personal calculations present it is extraordinarily unlikely to detect reside viruses in samples which have gone via greater than 33 cycles, and analysis10 revealed in April 2020 concluded sufferers with optimistic PCR checks that had a cycle threshold above 33 weren’t contagious and will safely be discharged from the hospital or house isolation.
Importantly, when officers on the New York state laboratory, the Wadsworth Heart, reanalyzed testing knowledge at The Occasions’ request, they discovered that altering the brink from 40 cycles to 35 cycles eradicated about 43% of the optimistic outcomes. Limiting it to 30 cycles eradicated a whopping 63%.11 The Vaccine Response provides:12
“In Massachusetts, from 85 to 90% of people that examined optimistic in July with a cycle threshold of 40 would have been deemed unfavorable if the threshold have been 30 cycles, Dr. Mina stated. ‘I’d say that none of these individuals needs to be contact-traced, not one,’ he stated.
‘I am actually shocked that it may very well be that prime — the proportion of individuals with excessive CT worth outcomes,’ stated Ashish Jha, MD, director of the Harvard World Well being Institute. ‘Boy, does it actually change the best way we have to be fascinated with testing’13 …
In late August, the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) permitted the primary speedy coronavirus take a look at that does not want any particular pc tools. Made by Abbot Laboratories, the 15-minute take a look at [BinaxNOW] will promote for U.S. $5 however nonetheless requires a nasal swab to be taken by a well being employee.14
The Abbot take a look at is the fourth speedy point-of-care take a look at that appears for the presence of antigens quite than the virus’s genetic code because the PCR molecular checks do.15“
Large Waste of Sources
As famous by Dr. Tom Jefferson and professor Carl Henegan in an October 31, 2020, article within the Each day Mail,16 mass PCR testing has been a large waste or assets, because it would not present us with the data we truly must know — who’s infectious, how far is the virus spreading and how briskly does it unfold?
As an alternative, it has led to financial devastation from enterprise shutdowns and isolating noninfectious individuals of their properties for weeks and months on finish. Jefferson and Henegan declare they shared their pandemic response plan with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson over a month in the past, and simply offered it to him once more. “We urge him to concentrate and embrace it,” they write, including:
“There are solely two issues about which we might be sure: first, that lockdowns don’t work within the lengthy time period … The concept a month of financial hardship will allow some type of ‘reset’, permitting us a brighter future, is a delusion. What, when it ends, can we suppose will occur? In the meantime, ever-increasing restrictions will destroy lives and livelihoods.
The second certainty is this: that we have to discover a method out of the mess that does no extra injury than the virus itself … Our technique can be to deal with the 4 key failings.”
These 4 areas are:
- Addressing the issues within the authorities’s mass testing program
- Addressing “the blight of confused and contradictory statistics”
- Shield and isolate the weak — primarily the aged, but in addition hospitalized sufferers generally and employees — whereas permitting the remainder to take care of “some semblance of regular life”
- Inform the general public concerning the true and quantifiable prices of lockdown that “kill individuals simply as absolutely as COVID-19”
“If we do this stuff, there’s actual hope that we will be taught to reside with the virus. That, in any case, was alleged to be the plan,” Jefferson and Henegan observe. With regard to testing, the pair name “for a nationwide program of testing high quality management to make sure that outcomes are correct, exact and constant.”
Importantly, we should not depend on optimistic/unfavorable readings alone. The outcomes have to be assessed in relation to different components, such because the age of the topic and whether or not they’re symptomatic, to find out who truly poses an infectious danger. You may overview the total particulars of their proposed plan on the finish of their Each day Mail article.17
Lockdown Risks Have Been Stored Out of Public Dialogue
Jefferson and Henegan aren’t the one ones highlighting the proven fact that the worldwide lockdown technique is inflicting extra hurt and destruction than the virus itself. In a June 16, 2020 article in The Federalist, James Lucas, a New York Metropolis legal professional, wrote:18
“If we’ll enable fashions and modelers to dictate the complete nature of our society, one would hope that the fashions are as full as doable. But the epidemiological fashions which have so reworked our world are severely incomplete, and due to this fact essentially insufficient.
Any medical remedy is alleged to be examined for each efficacy and security. There have been a number of research19 inspecting the effectiveness of the lockdowns in combating the unfold of the COVID-19 virus, with blended conclusions.
Thus far, nevertheless, none of those research or fashions have analyzed the protection aspect of the lockdown remedy. In response to questions from doctor Sens. Rand Paul and Invoice Cassidy, Dr. Anthony Fauci admits20 this aspect of the equation has not been accounted for within the fashions now driving our world.
As famous in an open letter21 lately signed by greater than 600 health-care professionals, the general public well being prices from the lockdowns — described as a ‘mass casualty incident’ are actual and rising.
These fashions are estimations primarily based on present analysis. The always altering projections of coronavirus deaths are extrapolations from analysis on earlier epidemics. But modelers haven’t any excuse for leaving evaluations of the lockdowns’ huge prices to public well being out of their fashions.”
The Hidden Prices of Lockdowns
How does the “lockdown remedy” have an effect on public security? In his article, Lucas highlights the following:22
• Elevated power illness charges on account of unemployment, poverty and placing non-COVID medical care on maintain — Analysis23 by the Veterans Administration has proven delaying most cancers therapy for only one month led to a 20% enhance in mortality. One other research24 discovered every one-month delay in breast most cancers prognosis elevated mortality by 10%
• Elevated charges of psychological well being issues on account of unemployment and isolation
• Elevated mortality charges from suicide — In a single research,25 being unemployed was related to a twofold to threefold larger relative danger of suicide. A newer research26 estimates “deaths of despair” linked to lockdowns could also be round 75,000 within the U.S.
• Diminished collective life span — Prolonged unemployment can also be related with shorter, unhealthier lives. Hannes Schwandt, a well being economics researcher at Northwestern College, estimates an prolonged financial shutdown might shorten the lifespan of 6.4 million People getting into the job market by a mean of about two years.27 Lucas notes:
“If epidemiologists do not care to take account of this toll, one other occupation should. A research28 simply launched by a bunch of South African actuaries estimates that the online discount in lifespan from elevated unemployment and poverty on account of a nationwide lockdown will exceed the elevated lifespan on account of lives saved from COVID-19 by the lockdown by an element of 30 to 1.
In different phrases, annually of extra life attributable to isolating potential coronavirus victims within the lockdown comes at a value of 30 years misplaced because of the unfavorable public well being results of a lockdown …”
Lack of training can also be related to considerably shorter life spans and poorer well being. Highschool drop-outs die on common 9 years ahead of school graduates,29 and college closings disproportionally have an effect on poorer college students.
Who Pays the Most?
As famous by Lucas, along with calculating the general prices on society, modelers should additionally decide “on whom these prices fall,” as a result of the prices should not borne equally by all. The implications of the lockdowns disproportionally have an effect on those that are already essentially the most weak — financially and well being clever — corresponding to these dwelling close to the poverty line, the chronically sick, individuals with psychological sickness and minorities in common.
“Opposite to the PR slogan, we’re NOT all on this collectively,” Lucas writes.30 “We want much less insipid pro-lockdown propaganda extolling the virtues of the ‘important’ staff, and extra severe evaluation of the large public well being toll the lockdowns are imposing on them. In any other case, we could come to see the period of coronavirus as merely the time the place pro-lockdown elites sacrificed the working class31 to guard themselves.”
A Pandemic of Fearmongering
An October 28, 2020, article featured by the Ron Paul Institute factors out that:32
“Ever for the reason that alleged pandemic erupted this previous March the mainstream media has spewed a continuous stream of misinformation that seems to be laser centered on producing most concern among the many citizenry.
However the info and the science merely do not help the grave image painted of a lethal virus sweeping the land. Sure, we do have a pandemic, nevertheless it’ a pandemic of ginned up pseudo-science masquerading as unbiased reality.”
9 info that may be backed up with knowledge “paints a really totally different image from the concern and dread being relentlessly drummed into the brains of unsuspecting residents,” the article states. Along with the truth that PCR testing is virtually ineffective, for all the explanations already talked about, these data-backed info embrace:
1. A optimistic take a look at is NOT a “case” — As defined by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Docs for Catastrophe Preparedness33 lecture, featured in “How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible,” media and public well being officers seem to have purposefully conflated “instances” or optimistic checks with the precise sickness.
Medically talking, a “case” refers to a sick particular person. It by no means ever referred to somebody who had no signs of sickness. Now impulsively, this well-established medical time period, “case,” has been utterly and arbitrarily redefined to imply somebody who examined optimistic for the presence of viral RNA. As famous by Merritt, “That’s not epidemiology. That is fraud.”
2. In accordance to the CDC34 and different analysis knowledge,35 the COVID-19 survival fee is over 99%, and the overwhelming majority of deaths happen in these over 70, which is near regular life expectancy.
3. CDC evaluation reveals 85% of sufferers testing optimistic for COVID-19 wore face masks “typically” or “at all times” within the two weeks previous their optimistic take a look at. As famous within the Ron Paul article,36 “The one rational conclusion from this research is that fabric face masks supply little if any safety from Covid-19 an infection.”
4. There are cheap, confirmed profitable therapies for COVID-19 — Examples embrace numerous regimens involving hydroxychloroquine with zinc and antibiotics, quercetin-based protocols, the MATH+ protocol and nebulized hydrogen peroxide.
5. The demise fee has not risen regardless of pandemic deaths — Knowledge37,38 present the general all-cause mortality has remained regular throughout 2020 and would not veer from the norm. In different phrases, COVID-19 has not killed off extra of the inhabitants than would have died in any given yr anyway.
As famous within the Ron Paul article,39 “Based on the CDC as of early Could 2020 the entire variety of deaths within the US was 944,251 from January 1 — April thirtieth. That is truly barely decrease than the variety of deaths throughout the identical interval in 2017 when 946,067 whole deaths have been reported.”
15,000 Docs and Scientists Name for Finish to Lockdowns
All in all, there are lots of causes to suspect that continued lockdowns, social distancing and mask mandates are utterly pointless and won’t considerably alter the course of this pandemic sickness, or the ultimate demise depend.
And, with regard to common PCR testing the place people are examined each two weeks or much more ceaselessly, whether or not they have signs or not, that is clearly a pointless effort that yields ineffective knowledge. It is only a tool to spread fear, which in flip permits for the speedy implementation of the totalitarian management mechanisms required to pull off The Great Reset. Luckily, increasingly more individuals are actually beginning to see via this plot.
About 45,000 scientists and medical doctors worldwide have already signed the Nice Barrington Declaration,40 which requires the top to all lockdowns and implementation of a herd immunity method to the pandemic, that means governments ought to enable people who find themselves not at important danger of significant COVID-19 sickness to return to regular life, as the lockdown method is having a devastating impact on public well being — far worse than the virus itself.41,42 The declaration states:43
“Coming from each the left and proper, and all over the world, we now have devoted our careers to defending individuals. Present lockdown insurance policies are producing devastating results on quick and long-term public well being …
The most compassionate method that balances the dangers and advantages of reaching herd immunity, is to permit those that are at minimal danger of demise to reside their lives usually to construct up immunity to coronavirus via pure an infection, whereas higher defending those that are at highest danger. We name this centered safety.”
The declaration factors out that present lockdown insurance policies will end in extra mortality sooner or later, primarily amongst youthful individuals and the working class. As of November 5, 2020, The Nice Barrington Declaration44 had been signed by 11,791 medical and public well being scientists, 33,903 medical practitioners and 617,685 “involved residents.”45